<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clifton Campville wind turbines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matthewellis.cc/archives/1735/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matthewellis.cc/archives/1735</link>
	<description>Member of Staffordshire County Council representing Lichfield Rural East - Cabinet Member for Adults and Wellbeing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:01:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin and Margaret Browne</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewellis.cc/archives/1735/comment-page-1#comment-14437</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin and Margaret Browne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 08:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewellis.cc/?p=1735#comment-14437</guid>
		<description>We live in Clifton Campville and do have major concerns:
1) the clandestine way in which this is happening, without appropriate opportunities for local people to comment.
2) the visual impact of wind turbines in this unspoilt rural area of the Midlands.
3) the views to and from Cannock Chase, Lichfield, Charnwood Forest, the North Staffordshire moors and Peak District will be changed for posterity.
4)  the proposed turbines are out of scale in the locality.
5) the superb Grade I listed St Andrew&#039;s Church with its spectacular spire is nearby and will be dwarfed by any turbines.
6) other concerns relate to cost-effectiveness, energy efficiency, the need for back-up power supply, and pollution (noise and light strobing), plus impact on local wildlife.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We live in Clifton Campville and do have major concerns:<br />
1) the clandestine way in which this is happening, without appropriate opportunities for local people to comment.<br />
2) the visual impact of wind turbines in this unspoilt rural area of the Midlands.<br />
3) the views to and from Cannock Chase, Lichfield, Charnwood Forest, the North Staffordshire moors and Peak District will be changed for posterity.<br />
4)  the proposed turbines are out of scale in the locality.<br />
5) the superb Grade I listed St Andrew&#8217;s Church with its spectacular spire is nearby and will be dwarfed by any turbines.<br />
6) other concerns relate to cost-effectiveness, energy efficiency, the need for back-up power supply, and pollution (noise and light strobing), plus impact on local wildlife.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe (published via email)</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewellis.cc/archives/1735/comment-page-1#comment-14290</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe (published via email)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 06:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewellis.cc/?p=1735#comment-14290</guid>
		<description>Joe. We don&#039;t get wind in the city where else do you think these windmills can go. Theres nothing wrong with them and we need the power here instead of having to get it from other countries. Just think of them as your version of sky scrapers .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe. We don&#8217;t get wind in the city where else do you think these windmills can go. Theres nothing wrong with them and we need the power here instead of having to get it from other countries. Just think of them as your version of sky scrapers .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon near Tamworth</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewellis.cc/archives/1735/comment-page-1#comment-14256</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon near Tamworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewellis.cc/?p=1735#comment-14256</guid>
		<description>You raise some interesting issues here. We are, on the whole, keen to be as &#039;green&#039; as possible but I too have some doubts over the genuine &#039;whole of life&#039; environmental benefits of wind turbines.

We are a few miles away from Clifton so not directly affected. Visually I have no real issues but having recently been to France I was surprised at the noise these things make.

I estimate the ones we saw to be of similar size to those proposed for Clifton and although there were half a dozen I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d want to live too close to them.

Interesting to see what happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You raise some interesting issues here. We are, on the whole, keen to be as &#8216;green&#8217; as possible but I too have some doubts over the genuine &#8216;whole of life&#8217; environmental benefits of wind turbines.</p>
<p>We are a few miles away from Clifton so not directly affected. Visually I have no real issues but having recently been to France I was surprised at the noise these things make.</p>
<p>I estimate the ones we saw to be of similar size to those proposed for Clifton and although there were half a dozen I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d want to live too close to them.</p>
<p>Interesting to see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

